|
|
61-79-list-digest Wednesday, May 27 1998 Volume 02 : Number 313 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE 61-79 - 160 degree t-stats and radials RE: FTE 61-79 - switching out my distributor > Re: FTE 61-79 - Engine Mounts To Put A 302 in A 66 6 Cyl FTE 61-79 - Wheels/ tires and parts for sale FTE 61-79 - FEs - now Motor Mounts FTE 61-79 - Possible engine swap FE -> 385 FTE 61-79 - Brazilian Fords/1957-1967 Ford Pickups RE: FTE 61-79 - silliness.. Re: FTE 61-79 - Re; F100 Overheating FTE 61-79 - Re: FTE 61-79 Ken's Gold Re: FTE 61-79 - 160 degree t-stats and radials Re: FTE 61-79 - Brazilian Fords/1957-1967 Ford Pickups Re: FTE 61-79 - Carbs FTE 61-79 - Clutch Chatter Re: FTE 61-79 - Possible engine swap FE -> 385 Re: FTE 61-79 - Re: FTE 61-79 Ken's Gold FTE 61-79 - virtual motors FTE 61-79 - A message from Stu Re: FTE 61-79 - virtual motors FTE 61-79 - DISC BRAKE CONVERSION F350 FTE 61-79 - ADMIN: Ranchero list? Re: FTE 61-79 - Possible engine swap FE -> 385 FTE 61-79 - RE: 68 F-250 FTE 61-79 - RE: Oil Drain Plug 68 F-250 FTE 61-79 - mixed tires > Re: FTE 61-79 - California get together FTE 61-79 - Junk Yard A C install????? FTE 61-79 - 1963 front disks anyone??? FTE 61-79 - Re: Brake light update ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 16:28:31 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 160 degree t-stats and radials > Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 15:06:12 -0500 > From: "John LaGrone" > Subject: FTE 61-79 - 160 degree t-stats and radials > Someone asked why they make them. In the good old days before smog > > control, that was the most comon flavor. In order to reduce unburned > hydrocarbons sooner, thermostat temps were raised. Generally, the That was me. I think you may be right about that now that I think about it. The solution may just be a higher pressure cap in most cases but engines run better at the higher temps too if they are set up for it. The 60's vintage may fare better if run cooler but after about 73 you need more than 160 or they won't run as well. > One other characteristic of radial tires. They maintain traction > better, but when they let go as in a sideways skid, they lose it > without warning and tend to roll off of the wheel whereas bias tires > > are better about plain old sliding and squalling. This is an old problem which I understand has been fixed, at least improved on so that it's no quite so apparent. > Why are you not supposed to rotate radials from one side of the > vehicle to the other? Again this was an old engineering problem that has been resolved for many years. Some off road tires still say to keep them on the same side due to tread pattern and the installer has to mount them correctly as well. 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's 78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! - -- Gary -- = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 13:29:39 -0700 From: "Gillespie, John D." Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - switching out my distributor > Chuy, again like everyone else has said; take your time and DON'T let anyone else around while your are doing your set up even the SWMBO unless she has already done a swapout or engine rebuild (-64Falcon V8 eons ago). I am going to South Texas for about a week, as soon as I get back I will be putting in the new "electronic" distributor in my truck and I will let you all know how it goes. South Texas from where your at that's not very far. Ooops Forgot where TAMU actually was.. Enjoy the fishing or whatever..... John = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 16:32:57 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Engine Mounts To Put A 302 in A 66 6 Cyl At 03:19 PM 5/27/98 -0400, you wrote: >Hi, > >I just subscribed, so plese forgive me if I'm asking an obvious question here. > >What engine mounts do I need to put a late model 302 in a 66 F100? My plan is >to put a late model Mustang HO EFI engine with AOD in my 66 truck. It looks >to me like 302 mounts for a 69 F100 would do the job. Is that right? > > >Thanks, >Don Haulsee >Richmond, Va. Don, the frame widths from 65-72 are the same so you should be able to use them with no problems. Ken = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 16:38:43 -0400 From: luxjo Subject: FTE 61-79 - Wheels/ tires and parts for sale All parts from 79, F-250. Tires/ wheels are from 1/2 ton. Most body parts are trashed/rusted-Drivers door seems OK Interior is red, no air. I'm keeping: 8 lug front setup, brakes, and axle shafts, cept locking hubs. Rear axle. C-6 and hardware to convert from man trans to auto including any TC adapters Wheels and tires > Carb Brake booster and mast cyl. Chrome front winch bumper-150$ Chrome rear step/hitch bump (matches front)-100$ Dana 44, 4.10 gear set (with bearings, shims and open diff if you want them)-50$ AC radiator, new core, -90$ Edlb, non-EGR perf man for 351M/400- 90$ 351M/400 distr.-30$ 351M long block- runs good, make offer Front driveshaft-50$ Rear drievshaft-50$ Front springs-25$ Rear springs-25$ Dana 60 rear, 3.54 ratio-100$ (I'm keeping 4.10 dana 60) NP205 Trans case-100$ Steering box-30$ Chrome valve covers and chrome push in breathers (2)-30$ 9", K&N, Chrome air cleaner, some surface rust-15$ Chrome dana 44 rear end cover-15$ Bed liner-50$ Black Grant GT steer wheel-20$ Sliding rear window, alum, no latch-25$ PS pump-10$ Want premium locking hubs, dana 44-40$. OR all for 700$ 79 F250 4 X 4 frame and cab, some floor rot pass side, free after I get what I need. 4 tires/rims, 32 X 12.5, X 15 (3 BFG AT, one Bridgestone AT) on flat black primered, 15 X 8, factory 78 Bronco wagon wheels (5 lug). Can have tires mounted or unmounted if you want to paint them- have bald, but air containing 32" spare on 15 X 6 steel rim-175$ 4 tires/rims, 35 X 12.5 X 15 (2 BFG AT-one new, 2 BFG MT) on 15 X 10 chrome modular with moroso alum center caps. Also have extra rim for spare-350$ I'm in central Jersey. OX = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 13:57:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Koster Subject: FTE 61-79 - FEs - now Motor Mounts Guys, you've got me all in a twist now. I'm putting a 61 390 (out of a car) into a 1963 truck. I've had two opinions on this so far. One says to buy the V8 motor mounts for the year of the truck (was 272). The other says to buy the motor mounts that fit the engine (out of a 61 thunderbird). Which is it? Dan > Bill Ballinger writes:>>Didn't they change the width of the thrust bearing > somewhere about '63-'64? The motor mounts > were changed somewhat in the time frame you are speaking of. I thought it > was '67, but that could very well be wrong, and is if you know that the > pre/post 64's were different. > > Azie > Ardmore, Al. _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 16:03:24 -0500 From: John Strauss Subject: FTE 61-79 - Possible engine swap FE -> 385 As you know because I talk about it everyday, I have just bought a '68 F-250 w/360 FE and C6. The engine hasn't run in at least 10 years but I fired it up on Saturday. Well it doesn't have compression for squat (might get better if it runs more, don't know yet) and the timing chain is real loose. Since the 360 was not a real powerhouse to begin with, I question whether this engine is worth the investment. If I find the rear seal leaking (very likely after so many years sitting) then it has to go. So I am already dreaming about what to put in it's place. As this truck is going to serve as my tractor, I want as big a motor as I can get. So I am thinking 385-series unless a good 390 or 428 falls in my lap. Right now I see way more folks selling 460s and a few 429s. Finally, the question: What can I expect as far as hassle factor to replace the FE with a 385 motor? I guess my only real concern is the motor mounts. I already know the C6 will bolt up, the exhaust is shot anyway, but will I need different frame mounts, different motor mounts, or neither? Accessory brackets are only alternator and A/C so I'll just try to get a motor with that stuff already in place. Is there anything else I need to be aware of when contemplating this? Also, are there specific years to get or stay away from when looking for a 429 or 460? I just want something running that I can drop in as is. TIA. _ _| ~~. John Strauss \, *_} jstrauss \( Texas Fight! = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 16:03:27 -0500 From: John Strauss Subject: FTE 61-79 - Brazilian Fords/1957-1967 Ford Pickups > If anyone's interested in this book, here's the details: > >Ford Pickups 1957-1967 >Author: Paul McLaughlin >ISBN#0-87938-385-2 >Published by Motorbooks International Publishers & Wholesalers > If anyone finds this book, PLEASE let me know because I have tried and found it to be out of print. I want one to replace the one somebody lost for me! Feel free to email me direct on it, too. TIA. _ _| ~~. John Strauss \, *_} jstrauss \( Texas Fight! = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 14:05:05 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - silliness.. At 10:49 AM 5/27/98 -0700, you wrote: >Hey Steve now THAT is definitely FTE relevant and I do like it. Besides how >else are we going learn all these new fangled computer programs. > >http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty/truck/ftezone2.jpg Thanks John! I figured that was a scene likely to be found along one of the roads to Pigeon Forge. Sure wish I could have gone... Steve Homepage: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty/ "When you stop learning, stop listening, stop looking and asking questions, always new questions, then it is time to die." -- Lillian Smith = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 14:05:06 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Re; F100 Overheating >> I've got a 160 thermostat and the radiator never gets above that. > >160 is too cold. (IMNSHO) I can't even imagine why they make them?? > You won't get good performance and economy keeping it that cold >unless you run pure hydrogen for fuel IMHO and the internal parts > >will never quite get fully expanded to achieve the correct >relationships (clearances) so more engine wear will be likely. I heartily agree that 160 is much to cold for good performance or economy and also accelerates engine wear. There's a reason that most OEM's are currently using thermos in the 185+ range! Higher coolant temps promote better efficiency and lower engine wear IF You can keep the coolant from boiling and IF You can keep the oil temps from getting to high... I run a 195 thermo in my FE390 with a good stock radiator and electric fans and it never overheats even under prolonged idling on the nastiest hot days. Steve Homepage: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.sonic.net/~sdelanty/ "When you stop learning, stop listening, stop looking and asking questions, always new questions, then it is time to die." -- Lillian Smith = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 17:05:03 +0000 From: tfmf211 Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: FTE 61-79 Ken's Gold Ken, I just finished up on pulling Stu's old A/C apart. I put in a new heater core and blower motor. I figured since the unit was out I'd replace anything on the interior that may go bad. I don't want to go into this thing again. I hope to have the unit installed by this weekend and ready to go to the shop to have the unit purged and charged with R-12. I checked into the R-134 conversion. Everything should work but has a higher head pressure that R-12. Also, the molecular structure of the R-134 is a lot smaller that R-12. What I was told, was that a non-leaking R-12 system may not even be able to hold R-134 due to leaks. If you have the old type A/C hoses, be very careful. They are expensive to replace. I just spent $223 to have new ones made. They're nice, but OUCH!! I don't know if yours had A/C before or not. You may want to check the bolt hole configuration on the fire wall. My old heater unit had 3 bolts holding it on the firewall. The A/C unit has two bolts for the lip of the dash and 2 bolt through the firewall. Looking at the firewall from in fron= t of the truck the left hole that was used with the heater lined up. The=20 right didn't exist. But....., there is a dimple about 1-1/2" down from the top right bolt hole for the old heater unit. Drill that out and it should line= =20 up with the unit. Mine came out of Stu's '71 and has '67 and '68 part numbers all through it. I believe they will be the same. I hope this helps some. Enjoyed meeting you, Peggy and all the other FTE folks at Pigeon Forge. I can't believe that guy sold my manifold at 2:30 am. Oh well, I'll keep=20 looking! Azie, I think you know what color necks are around Chinquapin! Later, -Ted ______________ >Ken > >When you get your A/C unit don't overlook the pulley set up. You might >need the crank pulley and the one that I missed, the power steering pulley. >It's different on non A/C vs one with A/C. Had to drive back about a hour >each way for that one!!!! > >Later >Steve >Calgary, > I've already got the two belt pulley on mine so I won't have to worry about it. Glad you mentioned it though so I can make sure its all there! Ken = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 23:17:47 GMT From: wayside Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - 160 degree t-stats and radials On Wed, 27 May 1998 15:06:12 -0500, you wrote: >Why are you not supposed to rotate radials from one side of the vehicle = to >the other? > I had a set of radial snow tires back in the 70's that probably were flipped side to side; both of failed the same way- the sidewalls split catastrophically. Rob '71 F100, 360 4Spd "The Old One" '78 F250, 4X4 400 C6 "The Brick" = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 15:26:34 -0700 From: "Bill Beyer" Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Brazilian Fords/1957-1967 Ford Pickups According to amazon ( www.amazon.com ) it's out of print but they will search their "network" of used bookstores for it if you ask. You might want to try. Good luck. - ---------- > From: John Strauss > To: Ford Trucks List > Subject: FTE 61-79 - Brazilian Fords/1957-1967 Ford Pickups > Date: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 2:03 PM > > > If anyone's interested in this book, here's the details: > > > >Ford Pickups 1957-1967 .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |