|
|
Please do not repost, forward or otherwise publish messages contained in these archives without consent from the respective author(s). These archives may not, in whole or part, be stored on any public retrieval system (FTP, web, gopher, newsgroup, etc.) by individuals or companies, without consent of the respective authors. Received: with LISTAR (v0.128a; list perf-list); Wed, 17 May 2000 21:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 21:02:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server To: perf-list digest users Reply-to: perf-list Subject: perf-list Digest V2000 #64 Precedence: bulk ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts Performance, Hot-Rod and Custom Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe perf-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ perf-list Digest Mon, 15 May 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 064 In This Issue: Re: max tire size: 92 F150 2WD Re: max tire size: 92 F150 2WD HOLLEY for sale on ebay Carb Q ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: CPortlock Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 16:28:03 EDT Subject: Re: max tire size: 92 F150 2WD In a message dated 5/15/00 1:14:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time, derekw << Those of you running wide tires on the same body style 2wd truck, what size are you running, and have you had ANY problems with rubbing/interference? Ideally, I'd like to go to a 275/60-15. >> It depends on what size tire your rims will support. I have a 92 Flairside and run 275/60-15 on the rear and 235/60-15 on the front. I also have Bell Tech lowering 2 inch front 4 inch rear Bud ------------------------------ From: "wish" Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:13:20 GMT Subject: Re: max tire size: 92 F150 2WD >i'm looking to install wider, >slightly lower profile tires. I have the optional 7.5 inch wide wheels. >So far, all i've heard is that a 255mm wide tire will fit- but this is >less than 1" wider than my current tires. > A 255 is probably about the widest you want to go on a 7.5" rim, I think the general rule is to keep the rim within 2" of tire width otherwise the angles on the beads can get extreme. Of course there's always exceptions to this, but I know putting 255/50's on my 17x8 rims was a stretch, a 60 series will have a better sidewall to work with, but may still be pretty tight ... a 275/60 has a good sized side wall, but will be pretty large compared with the 7.5" Calculating out the widths you find that the 275 is about 10.8", which in real life is still nearly 3" wider than your rims. The 255's are 10" or so, so still over that 2" "rule". If you are sticking with the stock rims I'd suggest the 255's as probably a good max, depending on how you use the truck. When I say it was a stretch, one tire shop couldn't do it because the sidewalls were too short, another did it for me, but being a tire store they have more experience and it still took them 2 tries. Just my $.02 wish 96 Mustang GT 5spd 4.6L 73ish 1/2ton 4x4 6.4L http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.public.iastate.edu/~wish Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 18:16:35 -0700 From: able office machines Subject: HOLLEY for sale on ebay "Looking for a carb for your ford off-road vehicle..." am replacing the one i used in baja last year and its for sale on ebay (#331907190). I shutter to think how much i have invested in it.. (needless to say a lot..) it has CENTER pivot floats and ALL off-road mods available have been done. Even has extended primary float bowl with foam cell to prevent slosh.. has been jetted and adj. by NW performance and off-road here in portland in october of last year.. ran in the baja. and been sitting on engine while i do the transmission transplant since then. It still has fuel in it and all the "GOOD" gaskets.. help my attempts at funding my baja-2000 attempt. bid HIGH.. VERY VERY high.. and often.. lol phil ------------------------------ Date: 17 May 00 22:02:23 EDT From: Tim Turner Subject: Carb Q '85 2.8; beter to use a 390 4-V Holley (ugh..), retune a 600 4-V Edelbrock or 500 2-V Holley for a stock to near stock engine that sees some use requiring low RPM oopmh in the sand? Never had any good experiences with Holley 4's in the long run, but good marks for the 2-Vs and Edelbrocks. Comments? Tim ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://webmail.netscape.com. ------------------------------ End of perf-list Digest V2000 #64 ********************************* ---------------------------------------------------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts Performance, Hot-Rod and Custom Truck List Send posts to perf-list If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list, send an email to: listar with the words "unsubscribe perf-list" in the subject of the message. Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com ---------------------------------------------------------- .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |